For faculty to be included in this report they must meet the following criteria:

Screen: Yearly Data
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.Record Start Date to Record End Date overlaps with Report End Date and AACSB: Sufficiency, College/Department > AACSB: Percent of Time Dedicated to the School's Mission, AACSB: Normal Professional Responsibility (check all that apply), AACSB: Qualification (2013 Standards), Brief Description for Basis of Qualification at least one has a value

Table 8-1 Intellectual Contributions
Date Range: [Report Start Date] - [Report End Date]	
Part A: Five-Year Summary of Intellectual Contributions	
	Portfolio of Intellectual Contributions	Types of Intellectual Contributions	Percentages of Faculty Producing ICs	
Aggregate and summarize data by discipline.	Basic or Discovery Scholarship	Applied or Integration/Application Scholarship	Teaching and Learning Scholarship	Total	Peer-reviewed journal articles	Additional peer- or editorial-reviewed intellectual contributions	All other intellectual contributions	Total	Percent of Participating Faculty Producing ICs	Percent of total Full Time Equivalent (FTE) faculty producing ICs	
[Discipline]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	
[Last Name], [First Name] 1	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	
Total	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	
[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	

Part B: Alignment with Mission, Expected Outcomes, and Strategy	
Provide a description of how the portfolio of intellectual contributions by faculty and by units within the school, where appropriate, align with mission, strategies, and expected outcomes. 	

Part C: Quality of Five-Year Portfolio of Intellectual Contributions	
Identify the qualitative and quantitative measures of quality used by the school and apply these measures to analyze and evaluate the portfolio of intellectual contributions.	

Part D: Impact of Intellectual Contributions	
(i) Analyze the impact of the portfolio of intellectual contributions on the theory, practice, and/or teaching of business, including qualitative and quantitative evidence.
(ii) Provide exemplars of the societal impact of the school’s intellectual contributions.	

Note: Please add a footnote to this table summarizing the school's policies guiding faculty in the production of intellectual contributions. The data must also be supported by analysis of impact/accomplishments and depth of participation by faculty across disciplines. The data presented in Table 8-1 should be supported by faculty vitae that provide sufficient detail to link individual citations to the information provided here. Interdisciplinary outcomes may be presented in a separate category but the disciplines involved should be identified.
Table Criteria
Peer-reviewed journal articles
Screen: Intellectual Contributions
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.Contribution Type contains the text "Journal Article" and Was this peer-reviewed/refereed? contains one of the substrings: "Yes", "Blind", "Peer" and AACSB: Was this contribution editorially reviewed? is not one of: "Yes" and Current Status is one of: "Accepted", "Accepted/In Press", "In Press", "Forthcoming", "Published", "Accepted and Published", "Published/Accepted", "Previously Accepted, now Published", "Completed" and AACSB Classification has a value and Is this publicly available? is not equal to "No" and Date Accepted is not before Report Start Date and First value of [Date Accepted] and [Date Published] is within the report date range
De-duplication logic:
Concatenation of: "Title of Contribution", "Date Published: Year", "Contribution Type"
[list of [Authors] as "[Last Name], [F. N.] [M. N.]"] ([Date Published: Year]). [Title of Contribution.] In [Editor(s)] [(Ed.),(s.),)] [If book chapter, Title of Book] ([Issue Number/Edition ed., vol. Volume, pp. Page Numbers or Number of Pages])[.] [City and State of Journal/Publisher]: [[Journal/Publisher/Proceedings Publisher]][.] [Web Address]
Additional peer- or editorial-reviewed intellectual contributions
Screen: Intellectual Contributions
Items:  All records
Criteria (is one of):
1.Contribution Type contains the text "Journal Article" and Was this peer-reviewed/refereed? contains one of the substrings: "Editor" and Current Status is one of: "Accepted", "Accepted/In Press", "In Press", "Forthcoming", "Published", "Accepted and Published", "Published/Accepted", "Previously Accepted, now Published", "Completed" and AACSB Classification has a value and Is this publicly available? is not equal to "No" and Date Accepted is not before Report Start Date and First value of [Date Accepted] and [Date Published] is within the report date range
2.Contribution Type contains the text "Journal Article" and AACSB: Was this contribution editorially reviewed? is one of: "Yes" and Current Status is one of: "Accepted", "Accepted/In Press", "In Press", "Forthcoming", "Published", "Accepted and Published", "Published/Accepted", "Previously Accepted, now Published", "Completed" and AACSB Classification has a value and Is this publicly available? is not equal to "No" and Date Accepted is not before Report Start Date and First value of [Date Accepted] and [Date Published] is within the report date range

Screen: Intellectual Contributions
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.Contribution Type contains the text "Conference Proceeding" and Was this peer-reviewed/refereed? is equal to "Yes" and Current Status is one of: "Accepted", "Accepted/In Press", "In Press", "Forthcoming", "Published", "Accepted and Published", "Published/Accepted", "Previously Accepted, now Published", "Completed" and AACSB Classification has a value and Is this publicly available? is not equal to "No" and Date Accepted is not before Report Start Date and First value of [Date Accepted] and [Date Published] is within the report date range

Screen: Presentations
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.Was this peer-reviewed/refereed? is equal to "Yes" and AACSB Classification has a value and Presentation Title has a value
De-duplication logic:
Concatenation of: "Title of Contribution", "Date Published: Year", "Contribution Type"
Concatenation of: "Presentation Title", "Date: Year", "Date: Month"
[list of [Authors] as "[Last Name], [F. N.] [M. N.]"] ([Date Published: Year]). [Title of Contribution.] In [Editor(s)] [(Ed.),(s.),)] [If book chapter, Title of Book] ([Issue Number/Edition ed., vol. Volume, pp. Page Numbers or Number of Pages])[.] [City and State of Journal/Publisher]: [[Journal/Publisher/Proceedings Publisher]][.] [Web Address]
[list of [Presenters/Authors] as "[Last Name], [F. N.] [M. N.] ([Presenter/Author])"], [Conference/Meeting Name], "[Presentation Title]," [Sponsoring Organization], [Location]. ([Date: Month Date: Day, Date: Year]).
All other intellectual contributions
Screen: Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.Current Status is equal to "Funded" and AACSB Classification has a value

Screen: Intellectual Contributions
Items:  Records not accounted for above
Criteria:
1.Current Status is one of: "Accepted", "Accepted/In Press", "In Press", "Forthcoming", "Published", "Accepted and Published", "Published/Accepted", "Previously Accepted, now Published", "Completed" and AACSB Classification has a value and Is this publicly available? is not equal to "No" and Date Accepted is not before Report Start Date and First value of [Date Accepted] and [Date Published] is within the report date range and item has not been displayed

Screen: Consulting
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.AACSB: If this activity contributes to professional practice standards or public policy, provide a classification has a value

Screen: Professional
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.AACSB: If this activity contributes to professional practice standards or public policy, provide a classification has a value

Screen: Public
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.AACSB: If this activity contributes to professional practice standards or public policy, provide a classification has a value
De-duplication logic:
Concatenation of: "Contract/Grant/Research Title", "Record End Year"
Concatenation of: "Title of Contribution", "Date Published: Year", "Contribution Type"
Concatenation of: "Record End Year"
Concatenation of: "Record End Year"
Concatenation of: "Record End Year"
[list of [Investigators] as "[Last Name], [F. N.] [M. N.] ([[Role]])"], "[Contract/Grant/Research Title]," Sponsored by [Sponsoring Organization], [Awarding Organization Is], $[Amount]. ([Start Date/Term: Month Start Date/Term: Day, Start Date/Term: Year - End Date/Term: Month End Date/Term: Day, End Date/Term: Year]).
[list of [Authors] as "[Last Name], [F. N.] [M. N.]"] ([Date Published: Year]). [Title of Contribution.] In [Editor(s)] [(Ed.),(s.),)] [If book chapter, Title of Book] ([Issue Number/Edition ed., vol. Volume, pp. Page Numbers or Number of Pages])[.] [City and State of Journal/Publisher]: [[Journal/Publisher/Proceedings Publisher]][.] [Web Address]
[[Consulting Type] or [Explanation of "Other"]], [Client/Organization], [Location]. ([Start Date/Term: Month Start Date/Term: Day, Start Date/Term: Year - End Date/Term: Month End Date/Term: Day, End Date/Term: Year]).
[[Position/Role] or [Explanation of "Other"]], [Organization/Committee/Club], [City], [State]. ([Start Date/Term: Month Start Date/Term: Day, Start Date/Term: Year - End Date/Term: Month End Date/Term: Day, End Date/Term: Year]).
[[Position/Role] or [Explanation of "Other"]], [Organization/Committee/Club], [City], [State]. ([Start Date/Term: Month Start Date/Term: Day, Start Date/Term: Year - End Date/Term: Month End Date/Term: Day, End Date/Term: Year]).
Percent of Participating Faculty Producing ICs
Individual: 	[AACSB: Sufficiency contains one of the substrings: "Participating"]
Summary: 	Count of Participating active users within the group that have produced Intellectual Contributions divided by the count Participating active users within the group. (A user's Participating status is defined on the "Individual" line above.)
Percent of total Full Time Equivalent (FTE) faculty producing ICs
Screen: Yearly Data
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.Record Start Date to Record End Date overlaps with Report End Date and Full-Time Equivalency has a value
Individual: 	[Mean of Full-Time Equivalency for the record(s) listed above.]
Summary: 	Total FTE of active users within the group that have produced Intellectual Contributions divided by total FTE of active users within the group, where total FTE is defined as the sum of each user's FTE (defined on the "Individual" line above).

Footnote Criteria
Note: In [Academic Year], [less than 20% of users have administrative data records. Some footnotes for this year have been suppressed.]

 1 [Last Name], [First Name]
[Note: AACSB's Maintenance of Accreditation handbook specifies that academic qualification is lost if three years have elapsed since a person completed their most recent graduate comprehensive examination. The person noted here has been included as "Scholarly Academic" on this report as they are marked as such in the system, even though it is indicated in the system that three years have elapsed since this person completed their most recent graduate comprehensive examination and does not have a doctoral degree. Consequently, you might consider changing this person to no longer have a qualification of "Scholarly Academic".]
Screen: Yearly Data
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.AACSB: Qualification (2013 Standards) contains one of the substrings: "Scholarly Academic"

Screen: Education
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.Degree is not one of: "DBA", "EDD", "JD", "PHD", "MD" (ignoring case and punctuation)

Screen: Permanent Data
Items:  All records
Criteria (is one of):
1.If currently a Ph.D student, year of most recently completed graduate comprehensive examination does not have a value
2.Difference (in years) from If currently a Ph.D student, date of most recently completed graduate comprehensive examination to Report End Date is greater than 3.0
[Note: In [Academic Year], [had a joint appointment] [and] had interdisciplinary responsibilities in [list of [Discipline] separated by ", "] [and] had interdisciplinary responsibilities in [list of [College (Discipline)] separated by ", "].]
Screen: Yearly Data
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.AACSB: Does this faculty member have a joint appointment with another discipline or with another institution? is one of: "Yes"

Screen: Yearly Data > College/Department
Items:  All rows
Criteria:
1.College contains one of the substrings: "Business" and Discipline has a value and position of the item is greater than 1.0

Screen: Yearly Data > College/Department
Items:  All rows
Criteria:
1.College does not contain any of the substrings: "Business" and College has a value
Note: In [Academic Year], [has no administrative data record] [was [On Leave?]] [in [list of [Discipline] separated by ", "]].
This will appear if [the user is missing an administrative data record], [the user was on leave during the report date range], [and/or] the user's current data displayed in the report differs in a prior academic year.