AACSB TABLE 3-1: FACULTY SUFFICIENCY AND QUALIFICATIONS SUMMARY FOR THE MOST RECENTLY COMPLETED NORMAL ACADEMIC YEAR USING STUDENT CREDIT HOURS (RE: Standard 3)1
[Select additional filters to use: Heading]: [list of [Select additional filters to use: Selected value] separated by ", "]
Date Range: [Report Start Date] - [Report End Date]
For faculty to be included in this report they must meet the following criteria:

Screen: Yearly Data
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.Record Start Date to Record End Date overlaps with Report End Date and AACSB: Sufficiency, College/Department > AACSB: Percent of Time Dedicated to the School's Mission, AACSB: Normal Professional Responsibility (check all that apply), AACSB: Qualification (2013 Standards), Brief Description for Basis of Qualification at least one has a value

Screen: Yearly Data
Items:  First record
Criteria:
1.Record Start Date to Record End Date overlaps with Report End Date and AACSB: Normal Professional Responsibility (check all that apply) is not solely Executive Education

Faculty Portfolio	Faculty Sufficiency Related to Teaching
(e.g., SCH, ECTS, contact hours)		Faculty Qualifications With Respect to 
Percent of Time Devoted to Mission5		
Faculty Member's Name	Specialty Field	Highest Degree, Year Earned	Participating Faculty Teaching Productivity (P)2	Supporting Faculty Teaching Productivity (S)2	Normal Professional Responsibilities3	Scholarly Academic (SA)4	Practice Academic (PA)4	Scholarly Practitioner (SP)4	Instructional Practitioner (IP)4	Additional (A)4	Brief Description of Basis for Qualification	
[Discipline]	Degrees or majors are offered in this discipline ☐
Degrees or majors are not offered in this discipline ☒
Non-Degree Granting Disciplines:
Screen: Yearly Data > College/Department > Discipline
Items:  All values
Criteria:
1.College contains one of the substrings: "Business" and Discipline has a value and Discipline is one of: "Business Law", "Economics", "Finance"	
[Last Name], [First Name] 1	AACSB Specialty	[[Degree] or [Explanation of "Other"]], [Year Completed]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[list of [AACSB: Normal Professional Responsibility (check all that apply)] separated by ", "]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[Brief Description for Basis of Qualification]	
Total [Discipline]	[See Below]	[See Below]		[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]		
	P ≥ 60% guideline for AACSB met ([See Below])		SA ≥ 40% guideline for AACSB met ([See Below])
SA + PA + SP + IP ≥ 90% guideline for AACSB met ([See Below])		
Grand Total	[See Below]	[See Below]		[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]	[See Below]		
	
P ≥ 75% guideline for AACSB met ([See Below])		SA ≥ 40% guideline for AACSB met ([See Below])
SA + PA + SP + IP ≥ 90% guideline for AACSB met ([See Below])		
Faculty Sufficiency Indicators1:

Overall guideline: P/(P+S) ≥ 75%
By discipline, location, delivery mode, or program: P/(P+S) ≥ 60%		Faculty Qualifications Indicators1:

SA guideline: SA/(SA + PA + SP + IP + O) ≥ 40%
SA + PA + SP + IP guideline: (SA + PA + SP + IP)/(SA + PA + SP + IP + O) ≥ 90%		

1.	This summary information is useful in assisting the peer review team in its initial assessment of alignment with Standard 3. The summary information allows the team to effectively focus its in-depth review of individual faculty vitae or other documents supporting the conclusions presented in the table. List all faculty contributing to the mission of the school including participating and supporting faculty, graduate students who have formal teaching responsibilities, and administrators holding faculty rank. For faculty not engaged in teaching, leave columns 4 and 5 (Faculty Sufficiency) blank. Faculty who left during the time frame represented in the table should not be included. Faculty members who joined the school for any part of the time frame are to be included. The school must explain the "normal academic year" format/schedule. Peer review teams may request documentation for additional years; for individual terms; or by programs, location, delivery mode, and/or discipline.
2.	The measure of "teaching productivity" must reflect the operations of the business school, e.g. student credit hours (SCHs), European Credit Transfer Units (ECTUs), contact hours, individual courses, modules, or other designations that are appropriately indicative of the teaching contributions of each faculty member. Concurrence of the metric must be reached with the peer review team early in the review process. If a faculty member has no teaching responsibilities, he or she must be listed and reflected in the qualifications section of the table. Online courses should use the same teaching metric being used for in-person courses and the manner in which this is calculated should be described.
3.	Indicate the normal professional responsibilities of each faculty member using the following guide: UT for undergraduate teaching; MT for master's level teaching; DT for doctoral level teaching/mentoring; ADM for administration; RES for research; ED for executive education; SER for other service and outreach responsibilities. A faculty member may have more than one category assigned. Individuals who teach only in non-credit executive education programs should not be listed in this table.
4.	For faculty qualifications based on engagement activities, faculty members may be Scholarly Academic (SA), Practice Academic (PA), Scholarly Practitioner (SP), Instructional Practitioner (IP), or Additional (A). Faculty members should be assigned one of these designations based on the school's criteria for initial qualifications and continuing engagement activities that support currency and relevance in the teaching field and to support other mission components. Faculty may meet the school's criteria for more than one category (e.g. SA and PA), but must be listed in only one category. Doctoral students who have obtained ABD status are normally considered SA or PA (depending on the nature of the doctoral degree) for 3 years. Faculty who have earned a doctoral degree will normally be considered SA or PA (depending on the nature of the doctoral degree) for 5 years from the date the degree is awarded. The "Additional" category should be used for those individuals holding a faculty title but whose qualifications do not meet the criteria established by the school for SA, PA, SP, or IP status.
5.	The "percent of time devoted to mission" reflects each faculty member's contributions to the school's overall mission during the period of evaluation. Reasons for less than 100 percent might include part-time employment, shared appointment with another academic unit, or other assignments that make the faculty member partially unavailable to the school. A full-time faculty member's percent of time devoted to mission is 100 percent. For doctoral students who have formal teaching duties, the percent of time devoted to mission should reflect their teaching duties only and not any other activities associated with their roles as a student, e.g. work on a dissertation. For example, a doctoral student who teaches one class over the normal academic year and a part-time faculty member whose responsibilities are limited to the same level of activity should be assigned the same "percent of time devoted to mission." A faculty member teaching in more than one discipline may be listed multiple times, but the percent of time devoted to mission should be reflected proportionally in each discipline and not be more than 100 percent. For part-time faculty the expected percentage is less than 100 percent and should reflect the amount of time devoted to the mission. If a school used a full-time equivalent (FTE) human resources system then the FTE may be a reasonable approximation for "percent of time devoted to mission." In the absence of an FTE system, the school should have a rational manner of assigning the percentage to part-time faculty that is agreed to by the Peer Review Team well in advance of the submission of the report.
Table Criteria
Date of First Appointment to the School
Screen: Permanent Data
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.Start Year has a value
[Start Month Start Day, Start Year]
Highest Degree, Year Earned
Screen: Education
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.Highest Degree You Have Earned? is equal to "Yes"
[[Degree] or [Explanation of "Other"]], [Year Completed]
Faculty Sufficiency
Screen: Yearly Data
Items:  First record
Criteria:
1.Record Start Date to Record End Date overlaps with Report End Date
[AACSB: Sufficiency]
Participating:
[AACSB: Sufficiency contains one of the substrings: "Participating"]
Supporting:
[AACSB: Sufficiency contains one of the substrings: "Supporting"]
Teaching Productivity
Screen: Scheduled Teaching
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.Course Prefix, Course Number all have a value and Number of Credit Hours has a value and Number of Credit Hours is greater than 0.0 and Official Enrollment Number has a value and Official Enrollment Number is greater than 0.0
[Sum of "Official Enrollment Number multiplied by Number of Credit Hours"]
Normal Professional Responsibilities
Screen: Yearly Data
Items:  First record
Criteria:
1.Record Start Date to Record End Date overlaps with Report End Date
[list of [AACSB: Normal Professional Responsibility (check all that apply)] separated by ", "]
Qualification Group
Screen: Yearly Data
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.Record Start Date to Record End Date overlaps with Report End Date
Scholarly Academic (SA)
[AACSB: Qualification (2013 Standards) contains one of the substrings: "Scholarly Academic"]
Practice Academic (PA)
[AACSB: Qualification (2013 Standards) contains one of the substrings: "Practice Academic"]
Scholarly Practitioner (SP)
[AACSB: Qualification (2013 Standards) contains one of the substrings: "Scholarly Practitioner"]
Instructional Practitioner (IP)
[AACSB: Qualification (2013 Standards) contains one of the substrings: "Instructional Practitioner"]
Additional (A)
[AACSB: Qualification (2013 Standards) does not contain any of the substrings: "Scholarly Academic", "Practice Academic", "Scholarly Practitioner", "Instructional Practitioner"] and ([AACSB: Qualification (2013 Standards) has a value] or [AACSB: Percent of Time Dedicated to the School's Mission has a value]
Percent of Time Dedicated to Mission
Screen: Yearly Data > College/Department
Items:  All rows
Criteria:
1.AACSB: Percent of Time Dedicated to the School's Mission has a value
[Mean of AACSB: Percent of Time Dedicated to the School's Mission for the reporting period]
Brief Description of Basis for Qualification (Enter brief quantitative and/or qualitative information corresponding to the school’s criteria for each category.)
Screen: Yearly Data
Items:  First record
Criteria:
1.Record Start Date to Record End Date overlaps with Report End Date
[Brief Description for Basis of Qualification]

Footnote Criteria
Note: In [Academic Year], [less than 20% of users have administrative data records. Some footnotes for this year have been suppressed.]

 1 [Last Name], [First Name]
[Note: AACSB's Maintenance of Accreditation handbook specifies that academic qualification is lost if three years have elapsed since a person completed their most recent graduate comprehensive examination. The person noted here has been included as "Scholarly Academic" on this report as they are marked as such in the system, even though it is indicated in the system that three years have elapsed since this person completed their most recent graduate comprehensive examination and does not have a doctoral degree. Consequently, you might consider changing this person to no longer have a qualification of "Scholarly Academic".]
Screen: Yearly Data
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.AACSB: Qualification (2013 Standards) contains one of the substrings: "Scholarly Academic"

Screen: Education
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.Degree is not one of: "DBA", "EDD", "JD", "PHD", "MD" (ignoring case and punctuation)

Screen: Permanent Data
Items:  All records
Criteria (is one of):
1.If currently a Ph.D student, year of most recently completed graduate comprehensive examination does not have a value
2.Difference (in years) from If currently a Ph.D student, date of most recently completed graduate comprehensive examination to Report End Date is greater than 3.0
[Note: In [Academic Year], [had a joint appointment] [and] had interdisciplinary responsibilities in [list of [Discipline] separated by ", "] [and] had interdisciplinary responsibilities in [list of [College (Discipline)] separated by ", "].]
Screen: Yearly Data
Items:  All records
Criteria:
1.AACSB: Does this faculty member have a joint appointment with another discipline or with another institution? is one of: "Yes"

Screen: Yearly Data > College/Department
Items:  All rows
Criteria:
1.College contains one of the substrings: "Business" and Discipline has a value and position of the item is greater than 1.0

Screen: Yearly Data > College/Department
Items:  All rows
Criteria:
1.College does not contain any of the substrings: "Business" and College has a value
Note: In [Academic Year], [has no administrative data record] [and] [did not teach any courses] [was [On Leave?]] [in [list of [Discipline] separated by ", "]] [was [AACSB: Qualification (2013 Standards)]] [in [list of [AACSB: Normal Professional Responsibility (check all that apply)] separated by ", "]] [while [AACSB: Sufficiency]] [spent [Sum of "AACSB: Percent of Time Dedicated to the School's Mission" divided by 1]% of time devoted to the school's mission].
Note: In [Term Calendar Year], had courses with credit hours greater than 20: [list of [[Course Prefix] [Course Number], Section [Section Number]] separated by ", "].
This will appear if [the user is missing an administrative data record], [the user was on leave during the report date range], [a course has unusually high credit hours], [and/or] the user's current data displayed in the report differs in a prior academic year.